During the week of July 29th, 2019, researchers from the International Institute for Legislative Affairs (Kenya) and the American Cancer Society released preliminary results from two recent waves of a longitudinal economic survey that track the livelihoods of smallholder tobacco farmers in Kenya. Over two growing seasons, the researchers closely followed both farmers currently growing tobacco and those who had stopped growing it (and vice versa). Among the many findings was that the median non-tobacco farming household had approximately double the household resources compared to the ones that grew tobacco. Though raw incomes didn’t vary too much between the two groups, the non-tobacco households allocated much of their precious land to own-consumption, typically producing food crops. Thus, they were growing their own food rather than cultivating tobacco and using the cash earned to buy food for their families. This was considerably better economically for these families largely because the costs of growing tobacco—both direct costs and particularly household labor costs— were typically so high that farmers were not making any profit after selling the leaf. Moreover, the results demonstrate that farmers who shifted away from tobacco typically experienced a significant increase in household resources, while the farmers who shifted their crops back toward more tobacco typically experienced declines in their household resources. These findings are consistent with a 2016 study on Kenyan tobacco farmers. The take-home: tobacco farmers in Kenya would be far better off to shift away from tobacco cultivation. Furthermore, government programs that help farmers make these shifts could further enhance their economic livelihoods, such as helping to provide credit to grow other crops, provide extension services to teach farmers to grow other profitable crops and supply and value chain enhancement.
News / August 2, 2019
Kenyan tobacco farmers are better off not growing tobacco, findings from two surveys reveal
Found in Alternative livelihoods
Price elasticity or affordability elasticity? A puzzle solved for practitioners of tobacco taxation
Price elasticity measures the sensitivity of consumers to changes in real prices, holding real income constant, while affordability elasticity measures the sensitivity of consumers to price changes adjusted for inflation and income changes. The existing scientific literature on tobacco demand abounds in both price and affordability elasticity estimates, without providing a clear explanation of the…
Research shows that Pakistan is more than ready for a significant tobacco excise tax increase
One in five adults in Pakistan use tobacco on a regular basis. This leads to serious consequences for the country’s public health and its economy: just over 160,000 deaths and an economic loss of 143,208 million rupees occur every year due to tobacco-related illnesses. In recent years, Pakistan has taken important steps towards protecting people…
Bans on Flavored Cigarettes Should Be Universally Embraced — And Include Menthol
In places where menthol has been included in flavor bans, tobacco companies have exploited loopholes to get around the harshest effects of the policies on their sales. For example, after the European Union announced its ban on flavored cigarettes, tobacco companies started producing peppermint-scented cardboard strips to place inside a pack of cigarettes or bag…
What does the experimental evidence say about whether e-cigarettes help people quit smoking?
More than half of U.S. smokers attempt to quit each year. More and more, these quit attempts have involved the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), such as e-cigarettes. Unlike pharmaceutical nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) products, ENDS are not approved by any medicines regulator around the world as smoking cessation devices. Many types of…